Gun Control Essays (913 words) - Typography, Publishing, Writing

Gun Control Yesenia Rodriguez South University Abstract [The abstract should be one paragraph of between 150 and 250 words. It is not indented. Section titles, such as the word Abstract above, are not considered headings so they don't use bold heading format. Instead, use the Section Title style. This style automatically starts your section on a new page, so you don't have to add page breaks. Note that all of the styles for this template are available on the Home tab of the ribbon, in the Styles gallery.] There is an appalling, despicable lack of gun control in the United States. In my opinion the manner in which the issue of gun control is approached in this country is bordering on criminal negligence in and of itself. The insanity surrounding this controversial issue is taking the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights in the United States constitution way too far. I ask myself this question, could the Founding Fathers of this amazing country have possibly envisioned a world in which teenagers could casually walk into a classroom, pull out a loaded pistol and cold bloodily murder their teachers and fellow classmates? I think not. I would posit that these fine men, these symbols of American liberty and democracy, would turn in their graves if they could see how their words, their intentions, were manipulated and grossly misinterpreted, to serve the purposes of those who pretend to be protecting the rights of their fellow American Citizens. On the contrary, it is my belief that they, the politicians, are recklessly endangering those whose rights they claim to be protecting. The Government needs to take a hard, honest look at the tragic loss of life that occurs in this country due to gang shootings, both intentional and accidental. The government needs to assume responsibility for this outrageous situation and realize that gun control in the United States needs to be federally regulated, sooner rather than later. Wherein lies the difficulty in subjecting citizens to more stringent gun control measures? What possible reasons could politicians have for opposing safety measures such as the mandatory registration of firearms, five days waiting periods, gun licensing for owners, permits to purchase and permits to carry guns as well as mandatory background checks? If you want to carry a firearm, I feel that all of the aforementioned requirements, at the very least, should be instituted in every single state. For heaven's sake, it is more difficult to enroll your child in school than it is to buy and own a gun in this country. Does that seem logical? Not to me. The reason being that as this controversy plays out, as the NRA (National Rifle Association), the various politicians and the many interest groups squabble aimlessly back and forth with each other, and more innocent people are losing their lives every day. Sure, some will argue that the majority of gun owners in this country are responsible citizens who have every right to own a gun to protect their families, their property and all that they have worked so hard for. Do you know what I say to that? Absolutely! I have no desire to have a person's right to protect themselves infringed upon, I would simply argue that stringent guidelines would be followed to ensure that that person was who they said they were, did not have a criminal record etc. before they were handed a weapon that could potentially result in a serious loss of life. If any citizen has an issue with a five day waiting period for instance, I would hazard a guess that their intentions for the use of that weapon are probably not the best. I would think that any responsible citizen, with nothing to hide would welcome proper gun control measures, as limiting the number of guns on the streets will ultimately reduce the risk that responsible citizens will ever need to use their w eapons in self-defense. There are some issues I truly believe should be state regulated, such as education. However, for an issue as monumentally important as gun control, I believe that the citizens of our country should all be subjected to the same measures for acquiring guns. Are the lives in one

Analysis of Henry Highland Garnets speech Let your motto be resistance Essays

Analysis of Henry Highland Garnets speech Let your motto be resistance Essays Analysis of Henry Highland Garnets speech Let your motto be resistance Paper Analysis of Henry Highland Garnets speech Let your motto be resistance Paper with the idea of black citizenship bringing into question the American Judicial system where in the in 1660s many states (New York, Maryland, Carolina, Virginia) had ruled that black Americans did not have American citizenship (Jordan.1968.16). Throughout the speech Let your motto be resistance we can see Garnets Presbyterian clergy tendencies with the speech being presented as if it were almost a church mass with Garnet first addressing all the oppressed sympathise with each other, then informing the people of what action God sees as the right road to freedom you should use the same manner of resistance as would have been just in our ancestors before finishing on an almost urge for the black slaves to go forth and spread the word of slave rebellion with the repletion of Die freemen than live to be slaves. This religious way of speaking combined with references to ancestors and the glory of Africa creates a link between Henry Highland Garnet and both Heathen and Christian slaves allowing for all groups to be drawn into the speech. The main argument of Let your motto be resistance is that there is a need for black slaves to resist slavery and resort to violence if necessary, with lines such as not much for redemption without the shedding of blood suggesting a need for the continuation of rebellion like the Turner revolt of 1831, where fifty nine white people were killed (Kolchin. 1993. 156). Its as if Henry Garnet was arguing this because violent acts seemed to place fear and a need to change in peoples hearts to a greater extent then the white abolitionists moral crusade (although these revolts normally ended in harsher measures being introduced an as with the turner revolt many slaves being hung), this can be seen with the line The time has come when you must act for yourselves. Throughout Let your motto be resistance we can see an intense form of rhetoric occurring in an attempt to persuade the audience that action was need to get anywhere in the war against slavery, with one of Henry Garnets major arguments being that God would not except slavery as an argument for going against the commandments and Christian way of life The forlorn condition you are in does NOT destroy your moral obligation to God.God will not receive slavery nor ignorance nor any other state of mind, for love and obedience to him. Not only would this continue the religious link between Garnet and the audience but it would also install an amount of fear that if one did not do all they could to escape and end slavery then god would punish them instead of punishment falling upon slave owners. This ideal is reinforced latter in Let your motto be resistance when slave owners are referred to as devils, suggesting that that by not trying to escape from oppression slaves were actually working a gainst Gods will under the Devil. This attack against slave owners continues with he who brings his fellow down so low as to make him contented with a condition of slavery commits the highest crime against God. This condemnation of slave owners as being the worst criminals allows one direct group for Garnet to aim an attack at, instead of just plantation owners, this gives the impression of an almost war like situation , with all slave owners on one side and a united slave nation on the other. It could be argued that garnet through arguing that slavery is against Gods will he could also be referring to the continued injustice of black slavery since in 1661 a Maryland court ruled that an Irish youth should have his slavery time shortened to three years from fifteen because it was contrary to the laws of God, which meant an American court had all ready agreed that the slave trade was morally wrong. It is unlikely that Garnets speech would have made much of an actual change despite provoking controversy, it was more acting as a motivational speech and trying to give direction to a population that had recently won a massive step forward over the Amistad revolt in 1839 where a ship of illegally taken slaves from Africa killed the crew of the ship Amistad and were found legally clear of murder in new York. This brought into question the ideal of slavery and whether black slaves were acting as freedom fighters throughout the various revolts.

Risk Assessment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Risk Assessment - Essay Example Large organizations tend to spend great number of resources on implementing security measures to keep their informational assets safe but the writer states that there is not much awareness about this aspect in the non-profit organizations that have very limited resources and IT budgets. The author of the chosen paper, Fox (2008) understands the constraint of limited budgets in non-profit organizations therefore devised the methodology that would not cause them any setbacks in their financial system. The following aspects are considered for the development of the respective methodology; inexpensive or free software components that are compatible with Microsoft, no new infrastructure risk is brought about in the system, tools must be simple enough to be operable by volunteers after only few training sessions. The methodology that has been proposed by the author involves a series of steps that should be followed to ensure that the non-profit organization understands the risks that might be present in their IT infrastructure. Fox (2008) proposed the following steps: The series of steps for the risk assessment process is detailed and covers some of the basic considerations that should be involved in the conventional mode of risk assessment for example; the views of the top management regarding the important data that should be safeguarded and the authorities who should have access to the data. However, the implementation of the methodology requires the assessor to be equipped with the knowledge of UML which might pose to be a challenge for the volunteers in the non-profit organization. It requires considerable training to possess the skill of framing real life instances into UML framework. Another aspect of the paper that could have been explained in a better manner involves COBIT and NIST 800-30 security standards. The methodology is claimed to be based on these security standards but the